+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 41 to 54 of 54

LINUX on miniplayer

This is a discussion on LINUX on miniplayer within the Rockbox forums, part of the Community Development category; Originally Posted by Hendrik No. People will try to get a free repair though. I've seen a lot of people ...

  1. #41
    mfb
    mfb nincs online
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hendrik View Post
    No. People will try to get a free repair though. I've seen a lot of people doing things on their hardware and then, when they damaged it, tried to get a new one for free. There was even one person who drilled holes!!! into his wlan router and he claimed free repair!
    People will always try that.

    Writing the software: x people for x months. They want their salary, too. So with every sold piece of hardware you will pay for the salary of the software developers, too.
    If a company doesn't have to pay for the software they can build the same player and can sell it for less money. So the first company which developed the software will not sell their players anymore because they can't offer the same price because there are more people who want to get their salary.
    Offcourse they will get their salary. Did you actually read my post? Making a complete rip-off of the player is illegal. It won't happen. Next to that, there already are a lot of M6 rip-offs in China, but even with all those rip-offs Meizu is very popular. The same counts for, for example iPod rip-offs. A rip-off will never be as popular as the original.

    Yeah, for sure. Try selling an mp3player without software. Only the hardware but no mp3 playback. Good luck!
    Again, did you read my post? Your reply has nothing to do with the quotation you put above it. I never implies anything about a firmwareless player. Offcourse a firmwareless player is worthless. I said that when the firmware is open it's a big plus for certain buyers. Just look at the popularity of Rockbox and iPodLinux.

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    489
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mfb View Post
    Again, did you read my post?
    Sure.

    Quote Originally Posted by mfb View Post
    Again bullshit. Money is made on selling the hardware,.
    That implies that you will only buy the hardware and not the software.
    Although hardware rip-offs may be illegal in China, too, I bet people will do it anyway. It's not that hard, put together some chips and put a case around. A mp3player is not that difficult as it uses standardized chips.

    Although projects like rockbox are very popular (at least in your point of view) you will need a firmware for the player in the beginning (as far as I understand the procedure). You will have to pay the software developers for this work. If a second company "steals" this firmware (because it fits without modifying on "their" players), they can sell their players cheaper than the first company and therefore the first company will not sell as much players as it would be possible.



    Please, get me right: I like open software especially for more simple things like mp3players but I can understand every company, which does not want to make their software/firmware/whatsoever open.

  3. #43
    mfb
    mfb nincs online
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hendrik View Post
    That implies that you will only buy the hardware and not the software.
    Although hardware rip-offs may be illegal in China, too, I bet people will do it anyway. It's not that hard, put together some chips and put a case around. A mp3player is not that difficult as it uses standardized chips.
    As I said: They already do. And they are not even near the popularity of the original product.

    Although projects like rockbox are very popular (at least in your point of view) you will need a firmware for the player in the beginning (as far as I understand the procedure). You will have to pay the software developers for this work. If a second company "steals" this firmware (because it fits without modifying on "their" players), they can sell their players cheaper than the first company and therefore the first company will not sell as much players as it would be possible.
    Again: It won't happen. You might overestimate the amount of costs for firmware development, a lot comes from open-source projects already, the M6 uses SoX for audio decoding for example. The firmware will never work on another player unmodified. Most of the firmware is written in assembler for speed and power consumption sakes, assembler is bound to the exact hardware. It's difficult to understand assembler to get individual pieces out of it. You would still need a very good engineer for that. But it is possible to reverse engineer it enough to create new code to drive the hardware.

    Also, when the license is the GPL (like Rockbox and Linux), derivative code must bear the same license. Thus, everybody benefits.
    Last edited by mfb; 10-28-2007 at 11:32 PM.

  4. #44
    Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hendrik View Post
    Very simple. You may damage your player by using another firmware. So there is no warranty anymore and you probably have to pay for the repair. You'll tell that to your friends and they will probably not buy a product of this company.

    ...
    Sorry for the misunderstood, I didn't want to ask a real question... I agree with your opinion, I wanted to say that if it would be such simple, their will exist lot's of open firmware throught the world... In my own opinion, their is two ends with open firmware : the company make lots of money due to many sells... Or it closes its doors... That's a big deal, and I perfectly understand why companies don't want to open their firmwares... But that's so sad

  5. #45
    Passing By
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    anyone have documentation for SA58700X07 ?

  6. #46
    mfb
    mfb nincs online
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rika! View Post
    anyone have documentation for SA58700X07 ?
    Nope. That's what's troubling everyone who would like to try I guess. Maybe ask Samsung realy nicely? :P

  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    489
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mfb View Post
    Maybe ask Samsung realy nicely? :P
    Like Cartman: 'But mooooooooooooooooooooom....' :P

  8. #48
    Passing By
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Last edited by Rika!; 11-26-2007 at 06:43 AM.

  9. #49
    Stalker
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    支持你们,热烈期待希望你们能为miniplayer编出LINUX ,呵呵

  10. #50
    umo
    umo nincs online
    Passing By
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    it would be awesome to have an open firmware happening. has anything like this been attempted at all? When i looked into in over a year ago meizu were very against the idea, and like audifish has said, i've never been able to find any data on the m6's chips..

  11. #51
    Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech Rep.
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pytak View Post
    Just so you know, the M6 CPU is @200 mhz, I'm sure that's enough to run linux.
    hmm. wouldnt it be cool to underclock it to gain battery life. its probably not using full computing capacity plaing only audio.

  12. #52
    Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech Rep.
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lexridge View Post
    Why re-create the wheel? Perhaps as a group we could take donations in order to send an M6/M6SE to the developers of Rockbox, in order to help them develop RockBox for the M6.
    be carefull on that "recreate wheel" :-D YouTube - Theo Jansen: The art of creating creatures

  13. #53
    Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech Rep.
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dravik View Post
    All linux operating systems are free,
    not true .

  14. #54
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    130
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Whats Linux without a keybord?
    - Look at Linux for Ipod... its awesome!

    advantages are feq that u can run selfmade programs, new codecs, new interfaces, wikipedia and so on...

    and its NOT IMPOSSIBLE
    u just need someone who can do it (;


 

Similar Threads

  1. Mounting M6 in Linux
    By jieryn in forum Technical
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-25-2009, 04:35 PM
  2. Meizu M6 and linux
    By snapster in forum Technical
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-22-2008, 09:49 PM
  3. Using the M3 with Linux
    By TUCG in forum music card M3
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-28-2007, 07:27 PM
  4. Miniplayer icons for Linux Desktop (download)
    By taiabati in forum General Meizu M6
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-05-2007, 09:29 PM
  5. Avidemux / Linux
    By scaglifr in forum Video and Imaging
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-01-2007, 02:30 PM