Meizu M9 pictures in the wild?

These pictures have been circulating the Meizu bbs since a few days. Could it be the real M9 design? Are they just fan-made renders? You'll be the judge to tell.

More pictures can be found in the thread.

Source

hmm how come the background is so blurred out? well if thats the new m9 im gonna buy it right away, looks reeeeeeally hot.

definetely renderings. you can see some "sharpness-bugs" and the homescreen is too unclear compared to the phone!

the cam looks like a fake.. so I think it's all fake.

btw, the earphone jack looks ugly..

I thoght the M9 will come with the old UI ?!

Why would it come with the old UI? It would make no sense.

Why does it looked like HTC diamond to me?

pretty sure this "photos" are fake..but if..and this is a big if...the m9 would look something like this..im a buyer :D

Definitely fake. The edges of the phone are too hard in comparison to the blurry background.

It could be the design, but i am sure they are fake.
Why? Simple; the M button is not visible on the third picture, the time is on all pictures the same, the camera lens looks fake and like EastLansingTelecom mentions you notice issue´s that you get with renders : colors aren´t as bright as they should be, pixels are missing and so on.

but nevertheless the concept is nice to see.

Thats real ugly

Definitely Fakes, Every Single One Of Them. They Are Also Very Ugly. I Hope The Is Not The M9 Design.

Why Is The M Button So Bright? And Why Does It Have A Shirt Button For A Camera?

Renderings. Plain and simple.

WOW this design looks awesome! Hope this real!

I think behind the m button is a LED or something like this. So in the third picture it could be off.

The biggest sign which shows you, that this is only Fanwork is that the hour is on 14:43 in every picture. AND the shadows on the picture on the wooden table are failed...

the OS is not android like it will be on M9
the cam is the cam icon :-)


but i like this design

I think it's a fake because

a) The Phone seems not really lying on the table and
b) the time is always the same, and i don't think that all these pictures were shot within one minute.
c) If these are the original pictures there would be some EXIF-data.
d) The resolution of 96dpi is not regular for standart cameras.

And last but not least:

Originally Posted by EastLansingTelecom

Definitely fake. The edges of the phone are too hard in comparison to the blurry background.